紀錄類型 : 書目-語言資料,印刷品: 單行本
其他作者 : Pines, Jesse M.,
出版項 : Hoboken, NJ :Wiley-Blackwell,2023.
面頁冊數 : pages cm
簡介 : "As emergency department (ED) physicians, we spend a good deal of our time ordering, interpreting, and waiting for the results of diagnostic tests. ED physicians are the experts when it comes to determining who needs a test to rule out a potentially life-threatening condition. There are several reasons for this expertise. First and foremost, we see a lot of patients with undifferentiated symptoms in a decision-dense and time-constrained environment. Especially for those working in busy hospitals, the expectation is to see everyone in a timely way, provide quality care, and ensure patients have a good experience. Some patients and consultants value lab or imaging tests more than the history and physical exam tests that formulate clinical intuition, a phenomenon called "technological tenesmus". However, if we order time-consuming tests on everyone, ED crowding and inefficiency will worsen, costs of care will go up, and patients will experience even longer waits than they already do. In addition, there is increased pressure to carefully choose who needs and who does not need tests in an evidence-based manner, particularly as costs of care have risen so dramatically in recent years particularly in the United States. ,"--
標題 : Evidence-Based Emergency Medicine - methods -
標題 : Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures -
版本 : Third edition.
ISBN : 9781119616818
LEADER 02279nam a22003138i 4500
001 40733
005 20230217121904.0
008 230214s2023 nju b 001 0 eng
010 $a 2023006631
020 $a9781119616818$q(paperback)
020 $z9781119616849$q(adobe pdf)
020 $z9781119616863$q(epub)
035 $99918556987106676
035 $a9918556987106676
040 $aDNLM/DLC$beng$erda$cDLC
041 0#$aeng
042 $apcc
044 $9United States
060 00$aWB 105
245 00$aEvidence-based emergency care :$bdiagnostic testing and clinical decision rules /$cedited by Jesse M. Pines, Fernanda Bellolio, Christopher R. Carpenter, Ali S. Raja.
250 $aThird edition.
263 $a2305
264 1$aHoboken, NJ :$bWiley-Blackwell,$c2023.
300 $apages cm
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
338 $avolume$bnc$2rdacarrier
490 1 $aEvidence-based medicine series
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
520 # $a"As emergency department (ED) physicians, we spend a good deal of our time ordering, interpreting, and waiting for the results of diagnostic tests. ED physicians are the experts when it comes to determining who needs a test to rule out a potentially life-threatening condition. There are several reasons for this expertise. First and foremost, we see a lot of patients with undifferentiated symptoms in a decision-dense and time-constrained environment. Especially for those working in busy hospitals, the expectation is to see everyone in a timely way, provide quality care, and ensure patients have a good experience. Some patients and consultants value lab or imaging tests more than the history and physical exam tests that formulate clinical intuition, a phenomenon called "technological tenesmus". However, if we order time-consuming tests on everyone, ED crowding and inefficiency will worsen, costs of care will go up, and patients will experience even longer waits than they already do. In addition, there is increased pressure to carefully choose who needs and who does not need tests in an evidence-based manner, particularly as costs of care have risen so dramatically in recent years particularly in the United States. ,"--$cProvided by publisher.
650 12$aEvidence-Based Emergency Medicine$xmethods$380329
650 22$aDiagnostic Techniques and Procedures$312868
700 1#$aPines, Jesse M.,$eeditor.$380330
700 1#$aBellolio, Fernanda,$d1979-$eeditor.$380331
700 1#$aCarpenter, Christopher R.,$eeditor.$380332
700 1#$aRaja, Ali,$eeditor.$380333
830 0$aEvidence-based medicine$380328